Friday, October 17, 2008

Do It Yourself Aluminum Boat Floors



WRITTEN LETTER TO A FRIEND AND NEVER SENT


Beloved,

I went to read the various thoughts on the debate Pietro Maso and to tell the truth I also tried to find out more about all this series of events that resemble nell'efferatezza so disconcerting. Ongoing debates you see on every television network where not all agree on the release easily, without a bit 'to rehabilitate prisoners younger and a bit' to leave the overcrowded prisons, but did not know for example that Peter Mason had made other three previous Attempts ... I was even more dumbfounded when I found out that he himself had admitted that he never had problems with their parents. I can understand the hatred that makes you 'react disproportionately and in a mad moment, but Peter and his friend George Mason decided coldly and other three times (unsuccessfully) to make a killing plus in the program include the sister, to remain single and undisputed heir. Cold and determined even after the confession of the crime, asked daily and willfully to take possession of his inheritance until someone has explained that maybe ... was not the case of stress.

Why me this thing does not seem completely normal? I hear priests, psychiatrists and social workers who, after interviewing for a few hours with the inmate they say the absolute integrity of mind. But then the reason for that act, by what was determined? Drug if there was drugs, alcohol if alcohol was, by her "narcissistic personality disorder," or great desire to get rich only by forgetting the value it can have a life? The fact is that there were four to think the same way! From this common thinking shiver sitting at a table in a bar. Really want to understand if there is an infirmity of mind or maybe the world was attacked by a contagious virus that causes some people a kind of mass social illness busts that all values. I no longer understand what is happening and why you want to hide the truth behind a carnival mask. In a glimmer conscience whispers to me that this guy like so many others need much help and clarify some important points, such as the sanctity of life. So I ask those who "assure" a murderess to justice if set at liberty can "ensure" the same way that the first occasion by returning to old habits can not have a relapse ... say "of social illness" that's terrible advice again another ridiculous folly? In that case who will pay for that mistake: the only victim?

0 comments:

Post a Comment