I did and ... we talk about football The day after the biggest humiliation in the history of Italian football is characterized by hunting down culprits.
on the top step, of course he Lippi. Deservedly so. If anything, it was still any doubt, it is now clear what has counted their luck in 2006.
Needless to retrace the history of avoidable his "return" to guide the national team. The players are not invited, even those confirmed "everything", the technical choices confusing and questionable (I want games like Marchisio Perrotta ... then you look for it!). Lippi has been shown not to be suitable for a position: unable to build a new group of players, unable to recognize the limitations of some of his ideas (a few), unable to change the situation and find alternative solutions in consequence of the many alarms (qualification, confederation cup, friendly). Failures that were supposed to reflect: he did not, he insisted. Lippi has continued to hide behind the rhetoric of the group, doubts about a project never really defined. The only thing is managed to instill in his players was the lack of security. A team scared and petrified, unable to do simple steps. The most obvious is that Pepe, the most vibrant and responsive in the early exits, recalled to the bench "because it was not what I said." Returning to the ranks, he became fearful and uncertain, so that Quagliarella yelled: "Do not worry, play as you know ..." What most annoys
but not the (deserved) defeat, or the utter confusion on modules and players : resentment against him comes from the arrogance with which he handled the experience.
presumptuous until its entry into the field with Slovakia, has demanded total control the team (they needed to do the preparation at high altitude when you've played 2 games out of 3 at sea el? Mah ..) and no one could put his mouth, thanks to the mantra: I won the World Cup.
could not end otherwise, it was obvious. All had predicted, everyone could see it ... and in the same way everyone, even the most critical, however, believed that Lippi would have found the form that his presumption was based on something. But no. But it was just as appeared in his disarmingly obvious: a person unfit and confused that he was hiding behind a ridiculous and presumptuous attitude to cover the deficiencies.
remember someone? A
me. Remember many, many members the ruling class of this country. A ruling class that never answers his mistakes, and that claims total and unconditional trust. In this logic, those who criticize is actually someone who wants to defeat Italy, which Owl, who is jealous ...
In this, the national team was a true reflection of the country. Lippi as Bertolaso \u200b\u200bas Lunardi. The national control as a family affair, where Cassano can not play because he had a fight with my son, who runs in a suspicious manner on market players, along with other children of the crack
in football and sport in general, there is Feedback clearly measurable. You won, you lost. You play well or badly. And at the end of the ride, if you're out you assume your responsibilities. How did Lippi, perhaps even starting to limit the focus of criticism and recrimination (very easy to do now).
In other areas it is still much room for maneuver to turn around the question. Then, if you have newspapers and television as hiding mistakes and change the result ...
Meanwhile echo the comments of those who, "this is the level of our football", "who else we would have to play", "is all the fault of too many foreigners". Again, these phrases seem to have already heard.
Fortunately in our country, football and politics are two areas separate and distinct, end up working ...
